Members of Congress Should Have Term Limits Essay

When the United States was founded, the theme behind the new government was to establish an efficient system without doling out too much power to any one person. The Founders intended to prevent a rebirth of tyranny, which they had just escaped by breaking away from England. However, when members of Congress such as Tom Foley, who served as a Representative from 1964 through 1995, and Jack Brooks, who served as a Representative from 1952 through 1994, remain in the legislative system for over forty years, it is evident that tyranny has not necessarily been eradicated from the United States (Vance, 1994, p. 429). Term limits are a necessity to uphold the Founders’ intentions, to prevent unfair advantages given to incumbents, and to†¦show more content†¦Today, career politicians are constantly looking for what will aid them in getting reelected. They become more loyal to their campaign fund contributers than to the people whom they represent. This increases the li kelihood of having corrupted politicians in office, as they use the government as a vehicle to further their own career (Kurfirst, 1996, p. 123, 129). George Will, a well-known political journalist, was quoted as saying â€Å"[The] worst feature of professionalism in politics is that it obliterates the proper distance between the representatives and the represented† (Kurfirst, 1996, p. 125). Even James Madison agreed that legislators were meant to represent the people, not hold office as a career. In The Federalist No. 57 (1788), he wrote, â€Å"From this change of men must proceed a change of opinions; and from a change of opinions, a change of measures.† The lack of new faces in Congress today symbolizes that the American legislative branch is straying from its intended purpose. While both houses were intended to have new members regularly with each election, the House of Representatives was especially supposed to change. James Madison wrote, in The Federalist N o. 57 (1788), â€Å"[Representatives] will be taken from that class of citizens which will...be most likely to aim at an ambitious sacrifice of the many and the aggrandizement of the few.† Whereas Senators wereShow MoreRelatedOne Of The Most Prominent Issues Facing The Current United1655 Words   |  7 Pagesis the lack of term limits for Congress members. The lack of limitation creates a system of career politicians that maintain many of the same legislative ideas or principles in Congress for many years, making it hard for changes in legislature to occur. With an aging congress population, many constituents feel out of touch with their representation and the system of seniority in place today allows for little chance of changes occurring without some sort of reformation. Unlimited terms create gridlockRead MoreWhy Congress Should Have Term Limits1607 Words   |  7 PagesIf Congress should have term limits or not has been a long debated question that is suggested as an a mendment to the qualifications division of the Constitution. There are outstanding arguments on both side of the issue 5; unconstitutionality versus limiting power and mixture versus seniority are just a few. Term limits are requirement to upload the founder’s objectives, to inhibit unfair advantages given to resident, and to permit an assembly of additional benefits. Opponents of term limits haveRead MoreThe Current Political Machine For House Incumbents1480 Words   |  6 Pagessixteen percent of Americans were happy with Congress. When American citizens are asked what solution they think would solve this problem, most respond, â€Å"Term limits† (Gallup)   In fact, eighty percent of Americans support the concept (Cato).   Ã‚  Ã‚   The turnover rate for House incumbents who attempt reelection is usually below ten percent. This is in far from the first century of America s government, when long-term congressional incumbency was rare and Members often voluntarily chose to leave WashingtonRead MoreThe Framers Of The U.s. Constitution Essay1640 Words   |  7 Pagesthat are taken in these pursuits improve other people’s lives as well. The issue begins when this greed grows unchecked and becomes a desire to have power over others. History has long shown that people who have power, especially power protected by a governing body, should be held accountable. A community of people should never assume that those they have elected to govern them possess greed that is more virtuous than individual greed. The Framers of the U.S. Constitution recognized this abuse ofRead MoreCongressional Term Limits934 Words   |  4 PagesCongressional terms have no limits. Controversy exists between those who think the terms should be limited and those who believe that terms should remain unlimited. The group that wants to limit the terms argues that the change will promote fresh ideas and reduce the possibility of decisions being made for self-interest. Those who oppose term limits believe that we would sacrifice both the stability and experience held by veteran politicians. They also point out that our election process allowsRead MoreInto:.. Lifelong, What Does This Term Mean To You? According1191 Words   |  5 PagesInto: Lifelong, what does this term mean to you? According to merriam-webster.com lifelong is anything that spans the entire lifetime of an individual. Most of the time this term refers to love, relationships, habits, traditions, and by many politicians their job. Now I know most of you are like I don’t understand you can t think of a job as lifelong because you do not get to keep a job forever? Well according to many of our Congress men and women it is the complete opposite because there isRead MoreTerm Limits1001 Words   |  5 Pagespast, we as citizens see what has worked and what can be improved; Congress is a good example of this. Some may say that Congress is a failure and some may be happy and proud of the way it functions and runs our country. For those who do not approve of it, the idea is to start fresh and get new ideas, people and habits into office. With the way Congress works today, that may not be the easiest tasks. In order to make changes in Congress, time is need ed; a significant change cannot be made over nightRead MoreEssay on Term Limits: We Dont Need Career Politicians660 Words   |  3 Pages Elections, especially of representatives and counselors, should be annual, there not being in the whole circle of the sciences a maxim more infallible than this, where annual elections end, there slavery begins. These great men . . . should be [chosen] once a year — Like bubbles on the sea of matter bourn, they rise, they break, and to the sea return. This will teach them the great political virtues of humility, patience, and moderation, without which every man in power becomes a ravenousRead MoreCongressmen See The Incumbency Advantage As A Blessing1105 Words   |  5 Pagesis clearly evident, and puts the democracy at risk because America was built on the foundation that no one person should fully control the country. Elections are held for our legislators in government to promote the shift in power. It was a leading cause to the creation of the XXII amendment stating that the president can serve two terms max. Each district is hurt by having long-term incumbents because this makes the representative less responsive to his constituents (Friedman 69). The incumbencyRead MoreMexico And Costa Rica Essay1201 Words   |  5 Pagescome up with the idea? What is a term limit you might ask? A term limit is a rule that prevents government officials from serving for more than a certain number of years. These limits reflect the manner in which the common people envision their higher ups. One ancient Athenian legislature, the Boule, placed a one-term limit on service, although the idea argued by the Greek philosopher Aristotle in the fourth century BCE. There were also limits in the first U.S. Congress established under the Articles

Researchers at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute have...

Researchers at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute have recently shown that a protein called GDF11 has the power to rejuvenate not only the muscles, but also skeletal and brain activity of mice. The researchers in question, Amy Wagers and Lee Rubin, are both heavily involved in the investigation of stem cells, and have been established among such standards for good reason. About 15 years ago, Wager conducted an experiment observing the circulation of blood from a young mouse through an older mouse, with what seemed to be slight revival in the restoration of muscles. From there, last year Wagers and Rubin examined the effects of GDF11 on mice, first by means of a para-biotic system resonant of the one used in the prior experiment. The next step†¦show more content†¦They have been compared to the introduction of antibiotics 70 years ago. As controversial as they are though, these investigations will be slow, their correct use will require trials, and their power also carries the p ower of misuse. One way or another, stem cells will be play a vital role in scientific development in years to come. In the spectrum of these cells is GDF11. GDF11 will, at some point, be clinically administered to humans, and it thought to have the power to slow Alzheimer’s and increase rate of neurogenesis. This research builds on centuries of conjectures that the blood of youths contains agents which might replenish that of an elder. When the first para-biotic test was administered with this purpose in the 1950s by Clive McCay, they found that the cartilage of the older mice had strengthened. At the time, there was still little known about how the body restores itself, and the results were not fully understood. It later became clear that stem cells are essential for keeping tissues vital. When tissues are damaged, stem cells move in and produce new cells to replace the dying ones. As people get older, their stem cells gradually falter. In the 2000s it was found that the stem cells were not dying off in aging tissues, but in fact thriving there, yet were not receiving the correct signals to operate. It was observed in the trials that the elder mice were once more youthful, while the attached younger mice were effectively growing old,

Researchers at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute have...

Researchers at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute have recently shown that a protein called GDF11 has the power to rejuvenate not only the muscles, but also skeletal and brain activity of mice. The researchers in question, Amy Wagers and Lee Rubin, are both heavily involved in the investigation of stem cells, and have been established among such standards for good reason. About 15 years ago, Wager conducted an experiment observing the circulation of blood from a young mouse through an older mouse, with what seemed to be slight revival in the restoration of muscles. From there, last year Wagers and Rubin examined the effects of GDF11 on mice, first by means of a para-biotic system resonant of the one used in the prior experiment. The next step†¦show more content†¦They have been compared to the introduction of antibiotics 70 years ago. As controversial as they are though, these investigations will be slow, their correct use will require trials, and their power also carries the p ower of misuse. One way or another, stem cells will be play a vital role in scientific development in years to come. In the spectrum of these cells is GDF11. GDF11 will, at some point, be clinically administered to humans, and it thought to have the power to slow Alzheimer’s and increase rate of neurogenesis. This research builds on centuries of conjectures that the blood of youths contains agents which might replenish that of an elder. When the first para-biotic test was administered with this purpose in the 1950s by Clive McCay, they found that the cartilage of the older mice had strengthened. At the time, there was still little known about how the body restores itself, and the results were not fully understood. It later became clear that stem cells are essential for keeping tissues vital. When tissues are damaged, stem cells move in and produce new cells to replace the dying ones. As people get older, their stem cells gradually falter. In the 2000s it was found that the stem cells were not dying off in aging tissues, but in fact thriving there, yet were not receiving the correct signals to operate. It was observed in the trials that the elder mice were once more youthful, while the attached younger mice were effectively growing old,

Evidence Generational Differences In Work â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Evidence Generational Differences In Work? Answer: Introduction The paper talks about the attitude and behavior of the people. It explains that how attitude determines the behavior of the people at the workplace. It explains the significance of the job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Positive attitude and behavior play a vital role in providing job satisfaction to the employees in the organization. An organization cannot achieve the long-term goals and objectives without positive attitude and behavior of the employees. Circumstances do attitudes determine behaviors at work Attitudes play a vital role to determine the behavior of the people at work. Attitudes and behaviors both are mandatory in order to achieve the long-term goals and objectives. Behavior is the part of the work. There are two aspects of attitude such as positive attitude and negative attitude. The positive attitude helps people to gain the success and growth of the organization while negative attitude influences the work adversely. So people should maintain a balance between positive attitude and negative attitude (Yukl, 2012). In this way, the company can meet its organizational goals and objectives. The people behavior depends upon the attitude of other people. Attitude refers to the beliefs, opinions, and feelings of the people. A positive attitude helps to the employees to gain the long-term goals and objectives in the workplace. Through positive attitude, people enjoy the work and they try to meet the organizational goals and objectives. If the people have the negative attitude th en it affects the business activities and operations negatively. Attitude evaluates and analyzes the potentials, capabilities, and efficiency of the employees. After various researchers, it has been analyzed that an organization can not accomplish the targets and objectives without positive attitude and behavior (Miller Rollnick, 2012). Attitude and behavior are the imaginary and hypothetical approaches that are important to gain the long-term success and growth of the company. It helps to maintain coordination and communication at the workplace. The planned theory has been developed to determine the attitude and behavior of the people. If the people have a negative attitude then they avoid from the work and they do not perform the job very well and effective way. The job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job involvement are the part of the attitude. Positive attitude towards the work provides job satisfaction to the employees. Therefore, attitudes determine the behavior at the workplace (Johnson, Morgeson, and Hekman, 2012). If the managers and top management maintain positive attitude and behavior at the workplace then the company can easily meet its long-term mission and vision. The work attitude strongly related to the behavior of the people as well as the organization. If the persons have more positi ve attitudes then they may have performed the task and duties better way. Through positive attitude, people like the job and working environment of the company. The organization should conduct the training and development programs and coaching for the employees to enhance and improve the attitude and behavior of the people. Thus, it helps to reduce the high employee turnover in the organization. The companies provide better customer services in the market through positive attitude and behavior of the people. It will also enhance and improve the performance of the employees and organization. There are some positive circumstances where attitudes determine the behavior of the people at the workplace which have been discussed below (Twenge, 2010). When the behavior and attitude are analyzed and measured at the specific level rather than universal and common level. When the attitudes and behavior arise in the parallel social situations. When the similar factors of the attitude are available. All these conditions determine the behavior of the people at the work (Heberlein, 2012). The social, economic and cultural and technological factors also determine the behavior of the people at the workplace. A positive attitude helps to reduce the stress and frustration of the employees. It provides job security and satisfaction to the people. If the people have negative attitude and behavior then it disrupts the teamwork and collaboration. The positive attitude provides support to reduce and remove the various key issues and challenges that are existing in the organization. Through positive attitude, people gain excellent knowledge, experience and it also improves the quality of the work. Attitude and behavior also evaluate and analyze the financial position of the company. The people maintain trust, faith, and coordination through positive attitude and behavior. It determines the right path to do the work with more effectively and efficiently. If the managers and supervisors maintain the good behavior then it motivates and guides the employees to improve the efficienc y and performance of the employees. An attitude and behavior are the most valuable assets of the company to gain the competitive advantages. The company can predict the growth and success of the organization through the positive attitude and behavior. Now it can be said that attitude plays a significant role to determine the behavior of the people at the workplace (Petty and Brinol, 2010). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment The job satisfaction and organizational commitment are the important aspects of the positive attitude. It provides the motivation to the workers for doing the work effectively and efficiently. It will also help to improve the productivity and efficiency of the employees. Another side organizational commitment is the individual psychological approach for the association. It also influences the working capacity and productivity of the employees (Steger, Dik and Duffy, 2012). The positive attitude provides high job satisfaction to the workers. There are various factors that determine the job satisfaction and organizational commitment which have been discussed below. After various researchers, it has been analyzed that personality determines the job satisfaction and plays a significant role in an organization. The company should build and develop the strong relationship with employees at the workplace which would help to increase the job satisfaction and morale of the workers (Shin, Taylor and Seo, 2012). There is a close relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Thus, the company should maintain the effective relationship with managers and coworkers. If the manager will listen to the workers, and care about their values and work then they will feel happy at the workplace. In this way, it will help to provide job satisfaction to the workers. The company should fix the job timings of the employees to perform the task effectively and efficiently. It will enhance and improve the quality and productivity of the workers. The employees come to the work with a certain set of the requirements and expectations. In this way, they understand the rules and regulations of the organization. In other words, they maintain a psychological contract with the association. The persons and environment both are interconnected with each other and influence the work attitudes of the people at the workplace. Therefore, it is positively related to the job satisfaction and organizational commitments (Yucel and Bektas, 2012). The job satisfaction also depends on the salary, compensation, bonus, and incentives. It affects the behavior and attitude of the employees at the workplace. Thus, the organization should grant the essential benefits to the employees for providing motivation and job satisfaction to employees. It is a very important factor that determines the job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The compensation and salary help to enhance and increase the capabilities and potential of the employees (Colquitt, Lepine, Wesson and Gellatly, 2011). Superior support is one of the biggest significant factors to provide job satisfaction to the workers. The managers and supervisors must provide support to the workers to enhance and improve the efficiency and productivity of the employees. They should maintain the reciprocal relationship with the employees to provide job satisfaction. There is a reciprocal relationship between job satisfaction and job security. After various researchers, it has been evaluated that job satisfaction is not possible without the proper job security. Thus, the company should ensure the job security to every employee to provide job satisfaction and motivation (Machery, 2010). All these factors provide job satisfaction to the employees at the workplace. The company should also provide training to the employees to improve their quality and performance. Another side, the top management, and managers should take care the values and feeling of the employees. They should understand the key issues and problems of the workers. Excellent and fair commitment should be done by the top management and supervisors of the company to provide employment satisfaction to the workers. They should not do the wrong and fake commitment with the employees. They should fulfill the needs and requirements of the employees (Kuhl and Beckmann, 2012). Conclusion The essay is based on the people attitude and organizational behavior at the work. Another side, it talks about the job satisfaction and organizational commitment. It explains that how positive attitude and behavior influence the growth and success of the company. If the company wants to accomplish the goals and objectives of the organization then it should provide motivation and job satisfaction to the employees. References Colquitt, J., Lepine, J.A., Wesson, M.J. and Gellatly, I.R., 2011.Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace. McGraw-Hill Irwin. Heberlein, T.A., 2012. Navigating environmental attitudes.Conservation Biology,26(4), pp.583-585. Johnson, M.D., Morgeson, F.P. and Hekman, D.R., 2012. Cognitive and affective identification: Exploring the links between different forms of social identification and personality with work attitudes and behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior,33(8), pp.1142-1167. Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. eds., 2012.Action control: From cognition to behavior. Springer Science Business Media. Machery, E., 2010. Explaining why experimental behavior varies across cultures: a missing step in the weirdest people in the world?.Behavioral and brain sciences,33(2-3), pp.101-102. Miller, W.R. and Rollnick, S., 2012.Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford press. Petty, R.E. and Brinol, P., 2010. Attitude change.Advanced social psychology: The state of the science, pp.217-259. Shin, J., Taylor, M.S. and Seo, M.G., 2012. Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees' attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change.Academy of Management Journal,55(3), pp.727-748. Steger, M.F., Dik, B.J. and Duffy, R.D., 2012. Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI).Journal of Career Assessment,20(3), pp.322-337. Twenge, J.M., 2010. A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes.Journal of Business and Psychology,25(2), pp.201-210. Yucel, I. and Bektas, C., 2012. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment and demographic characteristics among teachers in Turkey: Younger is better?.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,46, pp.1598-1608. Yukl, G., 2012. Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention.The Academy of Management Perspectives,26(4), pp.66-85.

Operation Overlord Essays - France, , Term Papers

Operation Overlord INTRODUCTION On June 5, 1944 Supreme Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower issued the Order of the Day. At 12:15 AM, June 6, 1944, 23,000 paratroopers and glider troopers plunged into the darkness and the allied troops; American, French, British and Canadian, stormed a 50-mile stretch of French beach called Normandy, D-Day had begun. General Eisenhower started the morning off with this speech to the troops: Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Forces: You are about to embark upon the Great Crusade, toward which we have striven these many months. The eyes of the world are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. In company with our brave Allies and brothers-in-arms on other Fronts you will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over oppressed peoples of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world. Your task will not be an easy one. Your enemy is well trained, well equipped and battle-hardened. He will fight savagely. But this is the year 1944! Much has happened since the Nazi triumphs of 1940-41. The United Nations have inflicted upon the Germans great defeats, in open battle, man-to-man. Our air offensive has seriously reduced their strength in the air and their capacity to wage war on the ground. Our Home Fronts have given us an overwhelming superiority in weapons and munitions of war, and placed at our disposal great reserves of trained fighting men. The tide has turned! The free men of the world are marching together to Victory! I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to duty and skill in battle. We will accept nothing less than full victory! Good Luck! And let us all beseech the blessing of Almighty God upon this great and noble undertaking. In midsummer 1943, a year before the Anglo-American invasion of Normandy that would lead to the liberation of western Europe, Adolf Hitler's Wehrmacht, or armed forces, still occupied all the territory it had gained in the blitzkrieg campaigns of 1939-41 and most of its Russian conquests of 1941-42. It also retained its foothold on the coast of North Africa, acquired when it had gone to the aid of Italy in 1941. The Russian counteroffensives at Stalingrad and Kursk had pushed back the perimeter of Hitler's Europe in the east. Germany or its allies still controlled the whole of mainland Europe, except for neutral Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, and Sweden. The Nazi war economy, though overshadowed by the growing of America's, outmatched both that of Britain and that of the Soviet Union except in the key areas of tank and aircraft production. Without direct intervention by the western Allies on the continent, an intervention that would center on the western Allies commitment of a large A merican army, Hitler could count on prolonging his military dominance for years to come. Since 1942, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin had been pressing his allies; U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, to mount a ?second front? in the west but the circumstances would not permit it. America's army was still forming, and the landing craft necessary to bring such an army across the English Channel had not yet been built. Britain had begun to prepare theoretical plans for a return to the continental mainland soon after the retreat from Dunkirk, France, in 1940. The Americans started to frame their own timetable immediately after Hitler declared war on the United States on December 11, 1941. Less inhibited than the British by perceived technical difficulties, the Americans pressed from the start for an early invasion, desirably in 1943, perhaps even in 1942. To that end, George C. Marshall, Roosevelt's chief of staff, appointed a prot?g?, Dwight D. Eisenhower, to the U.S. Army's war plans division in December 1941 and commissioned him t o design an operational scheme for Allied victory. Eisenhower convinced President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill that the priority had to be ?Germany First?. He framed proposals for a 1943 invasion (Operation ?Roundup?), and another (Operation ?Sledgehammer?) for 1942 in the event of a Russian collapse or a sudden weakening of Germany's position. Both plans were presented to the British in London in April 1942, and